on page 16, line 1 from the bottom:
"the idea is viable, is, `owever, another matter." should be
"the idea is viable is, however, another matter."
on page 18, line 6 from the bottom, should be insert:
[...speech acts performed in the utterances.]
" I said that the Davidsonian didn't appreciate the commitment to sentence meanings once 'that' -clause are recognized as referential singular terms, and I want to elaborate this a little, for the situation holds a certain irony.
I've argued, with Frege and many others, that 'that' -clauses are referential singular
terms, but I've yet to inquire into the nature of their references. Yet it's clear that
whatever 'that' -clauses refer to, these things must be capable of having
truth-values." [This means, ...]
on page 20, line 19 from the bottom, should be insert:
[...means that snow is white.] "She accepts all intentional facts at face value and is proud to be able to show how to accommodate the sentence that express them an a truth theory. So all that really remains is to show that the Davidsonian is committed to there being, for each language, a finitely statable theory that can correlate each sentence of the language with a 'that' -clause referent it means. And, though I eust skip the details, there's bound to be such a theory given that, for the Davidsonian, a finitely statable truth theory is available to determine a reference for each 'that' -clause on the basis of its syntax and the references its component words have in it."
Please cancel paragraph division cn page 14, line 9 from bottom, on page 15,
line 6, on page 18, lines 1 and 16, on page 19, line 10, on page 20, line 5, on page 23,
line 7 from bottom, on page 25, line 9.
Antonín Kosík
editor-in-chief